A couple weeks ago I wrote a post about identifying shorebirds in general, and White-rumped Sandpipers in particular. If you missed that post, you might want to check it out.
So in North America we have 5 small sandpipers (not counting extreme rarities, i.e. stints) that are usually collectively referred to as peeps. Three of them are smaller: Least, Semipalmated and Western Sandpipers. Two of them are bigger, though certainly not big: White-rumped Sandpiper and Baird's Sandpiper.
Let's talk briefly about spring. In the mid-Atlantic, in spring, there are NO Western or Baird's Sandpipers. None. Nada. Zip. Well, ok, maybe one Western. Maybe. I should perhaps clarify that as late as late April I have seen Western Sandpipers in the mid-Atlantic. These, I believe, are birds that wintered locally, and it can be fun to watch them over the weeks as they transition from winter/basic plumage to breeding/alternate plumage. Those birds invariably leave by the end of April. So come May, no more Westerns. Trust me on this one. As to Baird's, in both spring and fall it is a mid-continent migrant, and we only get a smattering of them in fall, usually juveniles.
On to "fall," meaning southbound migration, which begins in the last days of June for shorebirds. The photo above was taken in the South Cape May Meadows, NJ on August 8, 2015. This bird has everything going for it as a Western Sandpiper, except maybe that its bill is not one of those has-to-be-a-Western-because-the-bill-looks-like-it-came-off-a-Dunlin. However, the bill is still fine for a Western, long enough with a slight droop. The first thing I noticed on this bird was that it was well on its way to basic plumage. It's gray. The competing i.d. for Western Sandpiper is Semipalmated Sandpiper, and we pretty much don't see semis looking like this in the mid-Atlantic, and certainly not as early as August 8. Why? Because these species don't complete their pre-basic molts until they get close to, or are at, their wintering grounds. Semipalmated Sandpipers do not winter anywhere in North America, other than a few in south Florida. You might want to make a note of that; please do not report a Semipalmated Sandpiper in the mid-Atlantic or northward from December through March. As in all birding mistakes, this is a forgivable sin, but what you saw was certainly a Western Sandpiper or maybe a Sanderling, and your eBird reviewer is not going to validate a semi in winter.
Other things that are good for Western on the photo above include a thicker looking neck and bigger looking head than we see on Semipalmated. If you want more confirmation, click on the photo below to get a larger view, and look at the lower scapulars on either side of the bird.
This Western Sandpiper has molted and replaced many of its upperpart feathers, but it has retained one lower scapular on either side. Westerns are well known for having a lot of rufous above, specifically rufous concentrated on the scaps, and we can see that on these retained feathers.
All this Western Sandpiper plumage talk pertains only to adults. Juveniles are different, although they too have rufous concentrated on the scapulars. That's a post for another time. I have not yet seen a juvenile Western Sandpiper this fall.
On to the other eastern peep rarity: Baird's Sandpiper.
The photo above was taken at the South Cape May Meadows NJ yesterday, August 28, 2015. Richard Crossley had found this Baird's Sandpiper (left) the evening before, and I had just enough time before I had to head to work the next morning to walk down the Meadows east path to look for it. So I did. And I was able to look over the peep naked eye from fairly close range and go, "Oh. There it is."
Baird's and White-rumped Sandpipers are bigger than the other peep, and that is clearly obvious in the above photo. The bird on the right is a Least Sandpiper. Baird's and White-rumped Sandpipers also share the trait of long wings (being longer-distance migrants than the other peep), and their wingtips project well past the tip of the tail. They look decidedly pointy or attenuated in the rear. To my eye this is more obvious on Baird's than White-rumped. Baird's is also one of the "grasspipers," meaning its preferred habitat on migration is very short, often slightly damp grassy vegetation. You don't often see Baird's wading in water, but it can happen. . .and Least Sandpipers like grass, too. And so do Pectoral Sandpipers, which are also scaly looking above. But pecs have yellow legs, and so do Leasts.
By far, most of the Baird's Sandpipers we see on the Atlantic Coast are juveniles. I don't even have a photo of an adult Baird's Sandpiper to show you. Juvenile Baird's Sandpipers are beautiful birds, usually richly buff with a neat, scaly pattern above created by pale edges to the upperparts feathers. A final tip: Baird's Sandpipers look the part, in shape and in pattern. If you're not sure, it's probably something else. Consider other juvenile peep or Pectoral Sandpiper.
Finally, about the "boink." I wrote in my White-rumped Sandpiper blog that "I hit a bird and my mind went "boink" - different."
Boinks have to be earned. The way to be able to boink on an unusual bird is know the common species cold. In this case, rather than spending all your time looking for Baird's or White-rumped or Western Sandpipers, look at all the Semipalmated and Least Sandpipers. No two are alike, and they are also quite fun to watch as they probe and feed and squabble and fly and land again. Before you know it, you will start boinking on the scarcer species.
Saturday, August 29, 2015
Thursday, August 27, 2015
It's On Again Tonight
[Velocity radar from http://weather.rap.ucar.edu/radar/ - just now, 9:44 p.m., Thursday night August 27, 2015. That ain't rain - it's birds.]
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Friday, August 21, 2015
Fri-D: Drilling Down to an I.D.
Hmmmm, you look like an Olive-sided Flycatcher.
That's how it started with the bird in the photo above. The bird is dead center in the frame if you have a hard time seeing it. This is an uncropped image, taken Sunday, August 16, 2015 at Cape May Point State Park, NJ. If you figure that I was using a 300 mm lens with a 1.4x teleconverter on a cropped frame sensor (DX in Nikon terminology, adds a 1.5X multiplier), then in 35mm terms that's 630mm worth of lens. If you use the old rule of thumb that you can estimate magnification by dividing lens length by 50mm, then this is the view you would get through 12X binoculars.
The math looks like this: 300mm X 1.4 X 1.5 /50 = 12.6
I was using my customary Zeiss 8X42's, so what I saw in my binoculars looked substantially smaller than this. But it still looked like an Olive-sided Flycatcher. I knew this in part because I've seen a lot of Olive-sided Flycatchers (though they are a scarce to rare migrant in the east), and in part because it was August 16 and I had been thinking about OSFL all morning, and wanted to find one. I wanted this bird to BE one, which is a very dangerous thing in bird i.d. If you want to find it, you will - even if you're wrong.
But supposing you came at this bird without pre-conceived notions. Then what? Well, for starters, a lot of bird identification is about what it is not. This is not a goose, swan duck, turkey, loon, grebe, shearwater, gannet, cormorant, pelican. . . you get the idea. . .then you get to some things that it could be, like a dove, cuckoo, flycatcher (ding ding ding!), jay, swallow, thrush, warbler, sparrow, finch.
It's smallish but not super small.
Then you can consider where you are, and where the bird is. We're in Cape May, it's August 16, and the bird is perched on a prominent bare snag. It is not interested in leaving that area, as I learned by watching it for quite a while. It is perched in a fairly upright position. Now what are the possibilities?
Purple Martin. Red-winged Blackbird. European Starling. Or some kind of flycatcher.
The first thing I did was get down on my knees and prop the Zeiss on the railing of the observation deck, thus creating a very stable image. It can be amazing what you can see through mere binoculars when you do this. I was getting no color at all, just a silhouette, but I got a clearer picture of the bird's shape - upright, big-headed looking. At first I couldn't see its tail because of the way it was perched. Then it preened briefly, holding its wing out to the side, and I could see it had looong wings, and for an instant thought to myself, "You dolt! Are you just looking at a Purple Martin?" But, even without a look at the tail, the shape was wrong for that. And long wings are just fine for OSFL.
Then the bird shifted position:
Then I cheated. I looked at the back of the camera, and zoomed in on the bird as tightly as I could. This is what I saw:
Olive-sided Flycatcher.
Here's a bonus challenge, if you're in the mood. Yes, I know the camera's autofocus somehow decided the ripples on the water were more important than the totally obvious birds (grrrr), and the light is bad, but sometimes this is how we see things through binoculars. And, you can study these at leisure, unlike conditions in the field.
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Thoughtful Thursday: This Sign is Speaking to Me, But I'm Not Sure What It Is Saying
[Somewhere, South Dakota, July 2015. When you're on a vision quest, stuff like this makes you pause. . .]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









